Al- majāz in the Qur’an: Classification, Semantic Function, and Its Implications for Qur’anic Interpretation

Authors

  • M. Taufiq Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Tera Saputra Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • M. Hanafi Ramadhan Ginting Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Keywords:

al-majāz, qur’anic interpretation, balāghah, semantic function, islamic hermeneutics

Abstract

This article examines al-majāz in the Qur’an as a structured rhetorical-semantic mechanism that plays a central role in Qur’anic interpretation. The study addresses a conceptual, methodological, and interpretive problem in existing scholarship: Qur’anic figurative language is often treated either as a decorative aspect of balāghah or as a broad category of nonliteral expression without sufficient classification and textual control. Using a qualitative textual-hermeneutical design, the article analyzes selected Qur’anic passages through close reading, classical Arabic rhetorical classification, semantic analysis, and hermeneutical interpretation. The study focuses on how majāz can be classified through categories such as majāz lughawī, majāz ʿaqlī, majāz mursal, attributional transfer, part-whole relation, locality, causality, and contextual displacement. The findings show that majāz performs significant semantic functions in constructing Qur’anic concepts of guidance, misguidance, faith, disbelief, moral responsibility, divine-human relation, and eschatological consequence. Figurative expressions involving darkness and light, disease and the heart, opening and hardness, trade and loss, rootedness and instability demonstrate that majāz does not merely embellish Qur’anic discourse, but organizes theological and ethical meanings into coherent semantic fields. The article further argues that majāz functions as a hermeneutical control that mediates between rigid literalism and uncontrolled figurative interpretation. Its theoretical contribution lies in integrating classical balāghah, Qur’anic semantics, and contemporary hermeneutical theory into a systematic model for studying figurative Qur’anic language.

References

Abdel Haleem, M A S. “Qur’an and Hadith.” In The Cambridge Companion to: Classical Islamic Theology, 19–32, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521780582.002.

Abdul-Raof, H. “Textual Progression and Presentation Technique in Qur’anic Discourse: An Investigation of Richard Bell’s Claims of ‘Disjointedness’ with Especial Reference to Q. 17-20.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 7, no. 2 (2005): 36–60. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2005.7.2.36.

Abdul-Raof, Hussein. Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis. Routledge, 2006. https://www.routledge.com/search?kw=Arabic Rhetoric A Pragmatic Analysis Abdul-Raof.

Ardiansyah, Al Fiqri. “Kritik terhadap Hermeneutika dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an: Perspektif Ulama Tradisional dan Kontemporer.” Al-Muhith: Jurnal Ilmu Qur’an dan Hadits 4, no. 1 (2025): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v4i1.4232.

Ardiansyah, Al Fiqri, and Marhamah Annazah Tambunan. “From Normative Citation to Critical Analysis: Evaluating Methodological Problems in Contemporary Indonesian Qur’anic Scholarship.” Dialogues in Qur’anic and Hadith Studies 1, no. 1 (2026): 1–26. https://journal.bahsisfikr.or.id/index.php/DQHS/article/view/12.

Azaiez, Mehdi, Gabriel Said Reynolds, Tommaso Tesei, and Hamza M Zafer, eds. “The Qur’an Seminar Commentary: A Collaborative Study of 50 Qur’anic Passages.” De Gruyter, 2016.

Badawi, Elsaid M, and M A S Abdel Haleem. Arabic-English Dictionary of Qur’anic Usage. Brill, 2008. https://brill.com/display/title/12559.

Dukes, Eric D. “The Quranic Arabic Corpus: A Bridge Between the Sacred Text and Computational Linguistics.” Proceedings of the Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 2010.

Dukes, Kais. “The Qur’anic Arabic Corpus: Annotated Linguistic Resource for the Holy Qur’an.” Language Resources and Evaluation 47 (2013): 123–55.

Gleave, Robert. Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012.

Group, Pragglejaz. “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 22, no. 1 (2007): 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752.

Harb, Lara. Arabic Poetics: Aesthetic Experience in Classical Arabic Literature. Cambridge University Press, 2020. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/arabic-poetics/.

Kövecses, Zoltán. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2020. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/extended-conceptual-metaphor-theory/.

Krippendorff, Klaus. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications, 2018.

Lubis, Riski Suriani, Jesimawati Jesimawati, and Ummatul Hasanah. “Reframing Qur’anic Hermeneutics Beyond the Text–Context Binary: A Dialogical Model for Contemporary Interpretation.” Dialogues in Qur’anic and Hadith Studies 1, no. 1 (2026): 27–49. https://journal.bahsisfikr.or.id/index.php/DQHS/article/view/13.

McAuliffe, Jane Dammen, ed. Encyclopaedia of the Qur’an. Vol. 1–5. Brill, 2001. https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/browse/encyclopaedia-of-the-quran.

Neuwirth, Angelika. The Qur’an and Late Antiquity: A Shared Heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Qur’an, The Holy, and M A S Abdel Haleem. The Qur’an: A New Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Reynolds, Gabriel Said. The Qur’an and the Bible: Text and Commentary. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.

Semino, Elena. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press, 2008. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/metaphor-in-discourse/.

Shah, M, and M A Haleem. The Oxford Handbook of Qur’anic Studies. The Oxford Handbook of Qur’anic Studies, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199698646.001.0001.

Sinai, N. The Qur’an: A Historical-Critical Introduction. The Qur’an: A Historical-Critical Introduction: The Qur’an, 2017. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85212730983&partnerID=40&md5=a21fde1ceb5ab73c4440175a64fcddac.

Steen, Gerard J, Aletta G Dorst, J Berenike Herrmann, Anna A Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Trijntje Pasma. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14.

Tambunan, Warda Mardiana, Tiara Hidayah B, and Miftahur Rahmah. “Recontextualizing Āyāt al-Aḥkām: Maqāṣid-Based Legal Hermeneutics in Contemporary Qur’anic Exegesis.” Journal of Qur’anic Legal Studies and Exegesis 1, no. 1 (2026): 21–39. https://journal.bahsisfikr.or.id/index.php/JQLSE/article/view/7.

Vishanoff, David R. The Formation of Islamic Hermeneutics: How Sunni Legal Theorists Imagined a Revealed Law. New Haven: American Oriental Society, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-21

How to Cite

Taufiq, M., Saputra, T., & Ginting, M. H. R. (2026). Al- majāz in the Qur’an: Classification, Semantic Function, and Its Implications for Qur’anic Interpretation. An-Najah: Jurnal Ushuluddin Dan Studi Islam, 1(1), 60–74. Retrieved from https://bahsisfikr.or.id/index.php/ANJUSI/article/view/24

Issue

Section

Articles