Muqābalah in Surah Al-Lail: A Study of Semantic Aesthetics and Qur’anic Rhetoric

Authors

  • Aulia Rezki Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Novita Syafitri Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Muhammad Khaidir Ali Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Keywords:

muqābalah, surah al-lail, qur’anic rhetoric, semantic aesthetics, balāghah

Abstract

This article examines muqābalah in Surah Al-Lail as a semantic-aesthetic and rhetorical mechanism that organizes Qur’anic meaning through structured opposition. The study responds to the tendency to treat muqābalah merely as a formal ornament within badīʿ, whereas in Surah Al-Lail contrast functions as an interpretive principle that shapes the chapter’s moral and theological argument. The objective of the study is to identify the major patterns of semantic opposition in Surah Al-Lail, analyze their contribution to the surah’s rhetorical coherence, and clarify their ethical and theological functions in relation to human striving, divine guidance, and eschatological recompense. Methodologically, the study employs a qualitative textual-hermeneutical design supported by semantic-rhetorical analysis and limited corpus-assisted verification. The Arabic text of Surah Al-Lail is examined through close reading, classical balāghah, Qur’anic semantics, discourse analysis, and lexical verification. The findings show that muqābalah structures the surah through a progressive sequence of contrasts: cosmic polarity, human differentiation, ethical opposition, rhetorical persuasion, and final consequence. The oppositions between night and day, giving and withholding, God-consciousness and self-sufficiency, affirmation and denial, ease and hardship, and salvation and punishment form a coherent semantic field. The study contributes theoretically by reframing muqābalah as semantic architecture rather than simple antithesis, demonstrating that Qur’anic aesthetic form actively produces moral reasoning, theological meaning, and persuasive force.

References

Abdul-Raof, H. Text Linguistics of Qur’anic Discourse: An Analysis. Text Linguistics of Qur’anic Discourse: An Analysis, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315670942.

Abdul-Raof, Hussein. Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis. Routledge, 2006. https://www.routledge.com/search?kw=Arabic Rhetoric A Pragmatic Analysis Abdul-Raof.

———. Qur’anic Semantics: Corpus and Lexical Behavior. Routledge, 2023. https://www.routledge.com/search?kw=Qur%27anic Semantics Corpus and Lexical Behavior Abdul-Raof.

Akra, Diyam, Tymaa Hammouda, and Mustafa Jarrar. “QuranMorph: Morphologically Annotated Quranic Corpus.” arXiv, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18148.

Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali, and Guillaume Dye, eds. Le Coran Des Historiens. Vol. 1–3. Éditions du Cerf, 2019. https://www.editionsducerf.fr/librairie/livre/18851/le-coran-des-historiens.

Azaiez, Mehdi. Le Contre-Discours Coranique. De Gruyter, 2015. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/search?query=Le contre-discours coranique Azaiez.

Azaiez, Mehdi, Gabriel Said Reynolds, Tommaso Tesei, and Hamza M Zafer, eds. “The Qur’an Seminar Commentary: A Collaborative Study of 50 Qur’anic Passages.” De Gruyter, 2016.

Badawi, Elsaid M, and M A S Abdel Haleem. Arabic-English Dictionary of Qur’anic Usage. Brill, 2008. https://brill.com/display/title/12559.

Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Randi Reppen. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge University Press, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489.

Center, Pew Research. “How the Global Religious Landscape Changed from 2010 to 2020.” Pew Research Center, 2025. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/06/09/how-the-global-religious-landscape-changed-from-2010-to-2020/.

Creswell, John W, and Cheryl N Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Sage Publications, 2018.

Cuypers, M. The Composition of the Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis. The Composition of the Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis, 2015. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049160610&partnerID=40&md5=aa8750643913d2761fa34e5097f48c07.

Dukes, Kais. “The Qur’anic Arabic Corpus: Annotated Linguistic Resource for the Holy Qur’an.” Language Resources and Evaluation 47 (2013): 123–55.

El-Awa, Salwa M S. Textual Relations in the Qur’an: Relevance, Coherence and Structure. Routledge, 2005. https://www.routledge.com/search?kw=Textual Relations in the Qur%27an El-Awa.

Farrin, Raymond. Structure and Qur’anic Interpretation: A Study of Symmetry and Coherence in Islam’s Holy Text. White Cloud Press, 2014. https://search.worldcat.org/search?q=Structure+and+Quranic+Interpretation+Raymond+Farrin.

Flick, Uwe. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 6th ed. SAGE Publications, 2018. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/an-introduction-to-qualitative-research/book261109.

Günther, Sebastian, and Todd Lawson, eds. Roads to Paradise: Eschatology and Concepts of the Hereafter in Islam. Vol. 1–2. Brill, 2017. https://brill.com/display/title/31623.

Habash, Nizar Y. Introduction to Arabic Natural Language Processing. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00277ED1V01Y201008HLT010.

Harvey, Ramon. Transcendent God, Rational World: A Maturidi Theology. Edinburgh University Press, 2021. https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-transcendent-god-rational-world.html.

Izutsu, T. Ethico-Religious Concepts in the Qur’an. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002.

Lange, Christian. Paradise and Hell in Islamic Traditions. Cambridge University Press, 2016. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/paradise-and-hell-in-islamic-traditions/8BB7A1813C0D2A172FF7DB22059C59E1.

McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Hardie. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511981395.

Mir-Hosseini, Ziba. “Beyond Islam vs Feminism.” IDS Bulletin 42, no. 1 (2011): 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00201.x.

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. The Study Qur’an. New York: HarperOne, 2015.

Neuwirth, Angelika. Scripture, Poetry, and the Making of a Community: Reading the Qur’an as a Literary Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

———. The Qur’an: Text and Commentary: Vol. 1. Early Meccan Surahs: Poetic Prophecy. Oxford University Press, 2022. https://academic.oup.com/search-results?q=The Qur%27an Text and Commentary Volume 1 Early Meccan Surahs.

———. The Qur’an and Late Antiquity: A Shared Heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Pink, Johanna. Muslim Qur’anic Interpretation Today. London: Routledge, 2019.

Rahman, Z A. “Takaful: Potential Demand and Growth.” Journal of King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics, no. 1 (2009): 53–70. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77952835217&partnerID=40&md5=e79ca7df1cd1492ac3525a223a31b90f.

Reynolds, Gabriel Said. The Qur’an and the Bible: Text and Commentary. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.

Robinson, Neal. Discovering the Qur’an: A Contemporary Approach to a Veiled Text. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003.

Ryding, Karin C. A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge University Press, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486975.

Salman, Muhammad Umar, Muhammad Ammar Qazi, and Muhammad Taimoor Alam. “Quran-MD: A Fine-Grained Multilingual Multimodal Dataset of the Quran.” arXiv, 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17880.

Schmidtke, Sabine, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology. Oxford University Press, 2016. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-islamic-theology-9780199696703.

Sells, Michael A. “Approaching the Qur’an: Sound, Spirit, and Gender in Surat Al-Qadr.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Qur’an, edited by Jane Dammen McAuliffe, 141–60. Cambridge University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831601.008.

Shah, M, and M A Haleem. The Oxford Handbook of Qur’anic Studies. The Oxford Handbook of Qur’anic Studies, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199698646.001.0001.

Sinai, N. The Qur’an: A Historical-Critical Introduction. The Qur’an: A Historical-Critical Introduction: The Qur’an, 2017. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85212730983&partnerID=40&md5=a21fde1ceb5ab73c4440175a64fcddac.

Sinai, Nicolai. Key Terms of the Qur’an: A Critical Dictionary. Princeton University Press, 2023. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691241319/key-terms-of-the-quran.

Sinclair, John. Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. Routledge, 2004. https://www.routledge.com/Trust-the-Text-Language-Corpus-and-Discourse/Sinclair/p/book/9780415317684.

Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. Corpus Linguistics at Work. John Benjamins, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6.

Tracy, Sarah J. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2020. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Qualitative+Research+Methods%3A+Collecting+Evidence%2C+Crafting+Analysis%2C+Communicating+Impact%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9781119390787.

Versteegh, Kees. The Arabic Language. 2nd ed. Edinburgh University Press, 2014. https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-the-arabic-language.html.

Zadeh, Travis. The Vernacular Qur’an: Translation and the Rise of Persian Exegesis. Oxford University Press, 2015. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-vernacular-quran-9780198733331.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Rezki, A., Syafitri, N., & Ali, M. K. (2026). Muqābalah in Surah Al-Lail: A Study of Semantic Aesthetics and Qur’anic Rhetoric. An-Najah: Jurnal Ushuluddin Dan Studi Islam, 1(1), 157–173. Retrieved from https://bahsisfikr.or.id/index.php/ANJUSI/article/view/27

Issue

Section

Articles