Iqtibās in Islamic Rhetorical Tradition: Aesthetic Function, Argumentative Force, and Ethical Quotation of Sacred Texts
Keywords:
iqtibās, islamic rhetoric, sacred quotation, qur’anic intertextuality, ethical interpretationAbstract
This article examines iqtibās in the Islamic rhetorical tradition as a practice of quoting Qur’anic and prophetic language within human discourse. The study responds to the limitation of treating iqtibās merely as a decorative subcategory of badīʿ, arguing instead that sacred quotation operates through a complex interaction of aesthetic force, argumentative authority, and ethical responsibility. Using a qualitative textual-hermeneutical method, the article analyses selected discussions from classical Arabic rhetoric, Qur’anic rhetorical theory, and examples of sacred phrasing in literary, homiletic, and argumentative contexts. The analysis is guided by three intersecting frameworks: Arabic rhetorical theory, intertextuality, and argumentation theory. The findings show that iqtibās functions first as aesthetic revoicing, because Qur’anic and prophetic phrases reactivate rhythm, semantic density, scriptural resonance, and devotional memory within new textual settings. Second, iqtibās carries argumentative force by serving as authority, warrant, analogy, moral reinforcement, or legitimating frame in Islamic discourse. Third, the study demonstrates that the ethical validity of iqtibās depends on source fidelity, contextual coherence, and interpretive transparency. The article contributes to Islamic rhetorical studies, Qur’anic studies, and religious communication by reframing iqtibās as an ethical-rhetorical act rather than a purely stylistic ornament. This framework is especially relevant for analysing sacred quotation in both classical texts and contemporary digital religious communication.
References
Abdul-Raof, Hussein. Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis. Routledge, 2006. https://www.routledge.com/search?kw=Arabic Rhetoric A Pragmatic Analysis Abdul-Raof.
Abokhodair, N, A Elmadany, and W Magdy. “Holy Tweets: Exploring the Sharing of Quran on Twitter.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, no. CSCW2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3415230.
Ahmed, F, R Ul Amin, M Nawaz, and A Javed. “A Qur’anic View of Mother Tongue as the Medium of Education.” Trames 22, no. 3 (2018): 299–309. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2018.3.06.
Ahmed, Shahab. What Is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
Al-Jurjānī, ʿAbd al-Qāhir. Dalāʾil Al-Iʿjāz Fī Al-Qurʾān. Edited by Maḥmūd Muḥammad Shākir. Maktabat al-Khānjī, 2004. https://search.worldcat.org/search?q=Dalail+al-Ijaz+al-Jurjani+Mahmud+Muhammad+Shakir.
Al-Kharusi, M H, Khizar Hayat, K B Al Ruqeishi, and H R Lone. “A Critical Review of the Need for Knowledge-Centric Evaluation of Quranic Recitation.” ArXiv, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.12858.
Alam, Tanvirul, and Jodi Schneider. “Social Network Analysis of Hadith Narrators from Sahih Bukhari.” ArXiv, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.02009.
Alherran, Faisal. “Tadabur: A Large-Scale Quran Audio Dataset.” ArXiv, 2026. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.18932.
Allen, Graham. Intertextuality. 2nd ed. Routledge, 2011. https://www.routledge.com/Intertextuality/Allen/p/book/9780415596943.
Ardiansyah, Al Fiqri, Universitas Islam, Negeri Sumatera, Marhamah Annazah Tambunan, Universitas Islam, and Negeri Sumatera. “The Impact Of Ancient Quranic Manuscripts On Contemporary Linguistic And Exegetical Studies : An Interdisciplinary Analysis” 5, no. 2 (2023): 60–76.
Azaiez, Mehdi. Le Contre-Discours Coranique. De Gruyter, 2015.
Bano, M. Modern Islamic Authority And Social Change: Volume 2: Evolving Debates In The West. Modern Islamic Authority and Social Change: Volume 2: Evolving Debates in the West. Vol. 2, 2018. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85216707812&partnerID=40&md5=3e58ee20620406baa2eebc2887de2c43.
Bauer Hinrich A4 - Tunstall, Tricia, Thomas A4 - Biesterfeldt. A Culture of Ambiguity: An Alternative History of Islam. Columbia University Press, 2021. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/a-culture-of-ambiguity/9780231170659.
Blecher, J. Said the Prophet of God: Hadith Commentary across a Millennium. University of California Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520295933.001.0001.
Brandtzaeg, Petter Bae, and Marika Lüders. “Time Collapse in Social Media: Extending the Context Collapse.” Social Media + Society 4, no. 1 (2018): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763349.
Bunt, Gary R. Hashtag Islam: How Cyber-Islamic Environments Are Transforming Religious Authority. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2018.
Campbell, Heidi A, and Ruth Tsuria. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. Routledge, 2021.
Center, Pew Research. “How the Global Religious Landscape Changed from 2010 to 2020.” Pew Research Center, 2025. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/06/09/how-the-global-religious-landscape-changed-from-2010-to-2020/.
Creswell, John W, and Cheryl N Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Sage Publications, 2018.
Cuypers, M. The Composition of the Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis. The Composition of the Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis, 2015. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049160610&partnerID=40&md5=aa8750643913d2761fa34e5097f48c07.
Eisenlohr, Patrick. Sounding Islam: Voice, Media, and Sonic Atmospheres in an Indian Ocean World. University of California Press, 2018. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520298729/sounding-islam.
Elmahjub, Ezieddin, Junaid Qadir, Ammara Mushtaq, Ramsha Naeem, Irtaza Ghaznavi, and Waleed Iqbal. “IslamicLegalBench: Evaluating LLMs Knowledge and Reasoning of Islamic Law across 1,200 Years of Islamic Pluralist Legal Traditions.” ArXiv, 2026. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.21226.
Emon, Anver M, and Rumee Ahmed, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199679010.001.0001.
Esposito, John L, and Natana J DeLong-Bas. Shariah: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press, 2018. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/shariah-9780199325059.
Fawzi, Mohamed, Björn Ross, and Walid Magdy. “Fabricating Holiness: Characterizing Religious Misinformation Circulators on Arabic Social Media.” ArXiv, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.07845.
Fiqri Ardiansyah, Marhamah Annazah Tambunan Al. “From Normative Citation to Critical Analysis : Evaluating Methodological.” Dialogues in Qur’anic and Hadith Studies 01, no. 1 (2026): 1–26.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. New York: Continuum, 2004.
Gwynne, Rosalind Ward. Logic, Rhetoric and Legal Reasoning in the Qur’an: God’s Arguments. RoutledgeCurzon, 2004. https://www.routledge.com/Logic-Rhetoric-and-Legal-Reasoning-in-the-Quran-Gods-Arguments/Gwynne/p/book/9780700712587.
Halldén, Philip. “What Is Arab Islamic Rhetoric? Rethinking the History of Muslim Oratory Art and Homiletics.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 37, no. 1 (2005): 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743805050021.
Harere, Ali Al, and Khaled Al Jallad. “Quran Recitation Recognition Using End-to-End Deep Learning.” ArXiv, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.07034.
Isnayanti, Muhammad Ghifary Ramadani Mallo, Muhammad Nabil Ardhani. “Hadith Authority in Late Modern Islamic Ethics: Reframing Transmission, Rational Deliberation, and Normative Moral Reasoning.” Dialogues in Qur’anic and Hadith Studies 01, no. 1 (2026): 77–101.
Kermani Tony, Navid A4 - Crawford. God Is Beautiful: The Aesthetic Experience of the Qur’an. Polity Press, 2015. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/God+is+Beautiful%3A+The+Aesthetic+Experience+of+the+Quran-p-9780745645267.
Krippendorff, Klaus. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2019.
Mayada, Wafiq, and Destia Azzahra. “From Textual Authority to Contextual Reasoning : The Epistemology of Qur ’ Anic Legal Interpretation in Classical and Modern Tafsīr Introduction Because It Mediates the Relationship between Revelation , Normativity , Ethical Reasoning , and Literalist or Legally Mechanical . Legal Interpretation . Rather than Relying Exclusively on Inherited Legal Classifications And” 01, no. 1 (2026): 40–67.
Messick, Brinkley. Sharia Scripts: A Historical Anthropology. Columbia University Press, 2018. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sharia-scripts/9780231181068.
Neuwirth, Angelika. The Qur’an and Late Antiquity: A Shared Heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Niswa Mawaddah, Hilya Mahfuza, Syifa Farizkha Indriani, Dinda Silvani Paranginangin. “Hadith as an Epistemic Tradition: Toward a Dialogue between Classical Criticism and Modern Academic Inquiry.” Dialogues in Qur’anic and Hadith Studies 01, no. 1 (2026): 50–76.
Pink, Johanna. Muslim Qur’anic Interpretation Today: Media, Genealogies and Interpretive Communities. Equinox, 2019.
Pregill, Michael E. The Golden Calf between Bible and Qur’an: Scripture, Polemic, and Exegesis from Late Antiquity to Islam. Oxford University Press, 2020. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-golden-calf-between-bible-and-quran-9780198852421.
Reynolds, Gabriel Said. The Qur’an and the Bible: Text and Commentary. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.
Ricoeur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1976.
Schreier, Margrit. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage, 2012.
Sinai, N. The Qur’an: A Historical-Critical Introduction. The Qur’an: A Historical-Critical Introduction: The Qur’an, 2017. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85212730983&partnerID=40&md5=a21fde1ceb5ab73c4440175a64fcddac.
Sirry, Mun’im. The Quran with Cross-References. De Gruyter, 2022. https://www.degruyter.com/document/isbn/9783110780004/html.
Toulmin, Stephen E. The Uses of Argument. Updated. Cambridge University Press, 2003. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/uses-of-argument/26CF801BC12004587B66778297D5567C.
Zadeh, Travis. The Vernacular Qur’an: Translation and the Rise of Persian Exegesis. Oxford University Press, 2015. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-vernacular-quran-9780198733331.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 An-Najah: Jurnal Ushuluddin dan Studi Islam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




