kināyah In Qur’an 2:187: A Study of Qur’anic Aesthetics, Linguistic Ethics, And Legal Implications

Authors

  • Miftahul Husna Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Fatimah Zahra Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Keywords:

kināyah, qur’anic aesthetics, linguistic ethics, islamic legal hermeneutics, quran 2:187

Abstract

This article examines kināyah in Qur’an 2:187 as a Qur’anic mode of expression that integrates aesthetic refinement, linguistic ethics, and legal clarity. The study addresses the tendency to separate the verse’s rhetorical beauty from its ethical and juridical functions, especially in discussions of marital intimacy, fasting, and iʿtikāf. Using a qualitative textual-hermeneutical method, the article analyses the Arabic text of Q. 2:187 through selected expressions, including al-rafath ilā nisāʾikum, hunna libās lakum wa-antum libās lahunna, bāshirūhunna, and al-khayṭ al-abyaḍ min al-khayṭ al-aswad. The analysis combines Arabic rhetorical theory, Qur’anic stylistics, linguistic ethics, and Islamic legal hermeneutics. The findings show that kināyah in Q. 2:187 functions first as disciplined Qur’anic indirection, allowing intimate realities to be expressed clearly without vulgarity. Second, the garment imagery constructs marital intimacy through reciprocity, protection, concealment, and dignity. Third, the verse establishes a linguistic ethics of sexual discourse by sustaining modesty and legal intelligibility at once. Fourth, rhetorical indirection does not weaken legal meaning; rather, it supports the verse’s rulings on conjugal permission during Ramadan nights, the temporal boundary of fasting, and the prohibition of sexual relations during iʿtikāf. The article contributes to Qur’anic Studies, Arabic rhetoric, Islamic legal hermeneutics, and linguistic ethics by reframing kināyah as a Qur’anic strategy in which aesthetics, ethics, and law are mutually constitutive.

References

Abdul-Raof, Hussein. Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis. Routledge, 2006. https://www.routledge.com/search?kw=Arabic Rhetoric A Pragmatic Analysis Abdul-Raof.

al-Jassas, Ahmad ibn Ali al-Razi. Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Edited by Abd al-Salam Muhammad Ali Shahin. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 2020. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahkam_al-Qur%27an_%28al-Jassas%29.

Al-Jurjānī, ʿAbd al-Qāhir. Dalāʾil Al-Iʿjāz Fī Al-Qurʾān. Edited by Maḥmūd Muḥammad Shākir. Maktabat al-Khānjī, 2004. https://search.worldcat.org/search?q=Dalail+al-Ijaz+al-Jurjani+Mahmud+Muhammad+Shakir.

Al-Khalifa, Hend, Nesrine Ghezaiel, Mohamed Bounnit, H H Alhazmi, N A Alfear, R F Alqifari, A M Almasoud, and S A Al-Ghamdi. “ADAB: Arabic Dataset for Automated Politeness Benchmarking--A Large-Scale Resource for Computational Sociopragmatics.” ArXiv, 2026. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.13870.

Al-Qazwīnī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Al-Īḍāḥ Fī ʿulūm Al-Balāgha: Al-Maʿānī, Al-Bayān, Wa-Al-Badīʿ. Edited by Ibrāhīm Shams al-Dīn. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2023. https://www.al-ilmiyah.com/search?search=الإيضاح في علوم البلاغة.

Alhassen, Leyla Ozgur. How the Qur’an Works: Reading Sacred Narrative. Oxford University Press, 2023. https://global.oup.com/academic/search?q=How the Qur%27an Works Reading Sacred Narrative Alhassen.

Ali, Kecia. Sexual Ethics and Islam: Feminist Reflections on Qur’an, Hadith, and Jurisprudence. Revised edition. London: Oneworld, 2016.

Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge University Press, 2006. https://www.cambridge.org/core/search?q=Forbidden Words Taboo and the Censoring of Language.

Amaliyah, Ummi, Ida Safitri, and Shofwatun Niswah. “The Qur ’ Ān as Legal Proof : Authority , Language , and Juristic Argument in Al-Jaṣṣāṣ ’ s A ḥ Kām Al-Qur ’ Ān.” Journal of Qur’anic Legal Studies and Exegesis 01, no. 1 (2026): 1–3.

Archer, George, Henry Bainbridge, and Mohammad Ali Amir-Moezzi, eds. The Routledge Companion to the Qur’an. Routledge, 2021. https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Companion-to-the-Quran/Archer-Bainbridge-Amir-Moezzi/p/book/9781138350867.

Ardiansyah, A F, M A Tambunan, R P Alamsyah, and I A Akbar. “Qiwāmah And Epistemic Violence: A Critical Socio-Legal Analysis of Gendered Authority In Islamic Family Law.” Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 3, no. 2 (2025): 605–26. https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v3i2.100.

Ardiansyah, A L Fiqri, and Konsentrasi Tafsir. “ARAH EPISTEMOLOGI TAFSIR AL-QUR’AN DI INDONESIA, ANTARA AKADEMIK ATAU APOLOGETIK (Kajian Kritis Bibliometrik Atas Publikasi Artikel Jurnal Terindeks Scopus (2010– 2025),” 2025.

Ardiansyah, Al Fiqri, Universitas Islam, Negeri Sumatera, Marhamah Annazah Tambunan, Universitas Islam, and Negeri Sumatera. “THE IMPACT OF ANCIENT QURANIC MANUSCRIPTS ON CONTEMPORARY LINGUISTIC AND EXEGETICAL STUDIES : AN INTERDISCIPLINARY ANALYSIS” 5, no. 2 (2023): 60–76.

Ayubi, Z. “Rearing Gendered Souls: Childhood and the Making of Muslim Manhood in Pre-Modern Islamic Ethics.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 87, no. 4 (2019): 1178–1208. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfz072.

Azaiez, Mehdi, Gabriel Said Reynolds, Tommaso Tesei, and Hamza M Zafer, eds. “The Qur’an Seminar Commentary: A Collaborative Study of 50 Qur’anic Passages.” De Gruyter, 2016.

Barlas, Asma. Believing Women in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Qur’an. Revised edition. University of Texas Press, 2019.

Bauer Hinrich A4 - Tunstall, Tricia, Thomas A4 - Biesterfeldt. A Culture of Ambiguity: An Alternative History of Islam. Columbia University Press, 2021. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/a-culture-of-ambiguity/9780231170659.

Center, Pew Research. “How the Global Religious Landscape Changed from 2010 to 2020.” Pew Research Center, 2025. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/06/09/how-the-global-religious-landscape-changed-from-2010-to-2020/.

Creswell, John W, and Cheryl N Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Sage Publications, 2018.

Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Daniel Z Kadar, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7.

Cuypers, M. The Composition of the Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis. The Composition of the Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis, 2015. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049160610&partnerID=40&md5=aa8750643913d2761fa34e5097f48c07.

Elmahjub, Ezieddin, Junaid Qadir, Ammara Mushtaq, Ramsha Naeem, Irtaza Ghaznavi, and Waleed Iqbal. “IslamicLegalBench: Evaluating LLMs Knowledge and Reasoning of Islamic Law across 1,200 Years of Islamic Pluralist Legal Traditions.” ArXiv, 2026. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.21226.

Emon, Anver M, and Rumee Ahmed, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199679010.001.0001.

Esposito, John L, and Natana J DeLong-Bas. Shariah: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press, 2018. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/shariah-9780199325059.

Fiqri Ardiansyah, Marhamah Annazah Tambunan Al. “From Normative Citation to Critical Analysis : Evaluating Methodological.” Dialogues in Qur’anic and Hadith Studies 01, no. 1 (2026): 1–26.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. New York: Continuum, 2004.

Galadari, Abdulla. Qur’anic Hermeneutics: Between Science, History, and the Bible. Bloomsbury Academic, 2018. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/quranic-hermeneutics-9781350070039/.

Guellil, Imane, Houda Saadane, Faical Azouaou, Billel Gueni, and Damien Nouvel. “Arabic Natural Language Processing: An Overview.” ArXiv, 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.02784.

Harvey, Ramon. The Qur’an and the Just Society. Edinburgh University Press, 2018. https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-the-qur-an-and-the-just-society.html.

Haugh, Michael, Daniel Z Kadar, and Marina Terkourafi, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics. Cambridge University Press, 2021. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-sociopragmatics/.

Hsieh, Hsiu-Fang, and Sarah E Shannon. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15, no. 9 (2005): 1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.

Hussin, Iza R. The Politics of Islamic Law: Local Elites, Colonial Authority, and the Making of the Muslim State. University of Chicago Press, 2016. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo22817452.html.

Ibrahim, Celene. Women and Gender in the Qur’an. Oxford University Press, 2020. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/women-and-gender-in-the-quran-9780190067236.

Katz, Marion Holmes. Wives and Work: Islamic Law and Ethics before Modernity. Columbia University Press, 2022. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/katz20240.

Kermani, Navid. God Is Beautiful: The Aesthetic Experience of the Quran. Polity Press, 2015. https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=god-is-beautiful-the-aesthetic-experience-of-the-quran--9780745645261.

Krippendorff, Klaus. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2019.

Mouhoub, Mohamed Amine. “Islamic Large Language Models: From Knowledge Acquisition to Trustworthy and Hallucination-Resistant AI.” arXiv, 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16629.

Mubarak, Hadia. Rebellious Wives, Neglectful Husbands: Controversies in Modern Qur’anic Commentaries. Oxford University Press, 2022. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rebellious-wives-neglectful-husbands-9780197553305.

Muhammad Reza Pahlavi, Abdul Aziz Hasibuan, Yessy Sundary. “Competing Qur’anic Authorities in the Public Sphere: Textual Meaning, Social Contestation, and Interpretive Politics in Contemporary Indonesia.” Dialogues in Qur’anic and Hadith Studies 01, no. 1 (2026): 102–24.

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. The Study Qur’an. New York: HarperOne, 2015.

Neuwirth, Angelika. The Qur’an and Late Antiquity: A Shared Heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Rabb, Intisar A. Doubt in Islamic Law: A History of Legal Maxims, Interpretation, and Islamic Criminal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

Ricoeur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1976.

Rippin, A, and J Mojaddedi. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Qur’ān, Second Edition. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Qur’ān, Second Edition, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118964873.

Riski Suriani Lubis, Jesimawati, Ummatul hasanah. “Reframing Qur’anic Hermeneutics Beyond the Text–Context Binary: A Dialogical Model for Contemporary Interpretation.” Dialogues in Qur’anic and Hadith Studies 01, no. 1 (2026): 27–49.

Schreier, Margrit. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage, 2012.

Shah, M, and M A Haleem. The Oxford Handbook of Qur’anic Studies. The Oxford Handbook of Qur’anic Studies, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199698646.001.0001.

Sinai, Nicolai. Key Terms of the Qur’an: A Critical Dictionary. Princeton University Press, 2023. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691241319/key-terms-of-the-quran.

Tambunan, Marhamah Annazah. “Mekanisme Psikologis Dalam Proses Tazkiyah Al-Nafs Menurut Al-Qur’an: Studi Interdisipliner Antara Tasawuf Dan Psikologi Kontemporer.” AL-YAMIN Journal Of Islmic Studies And Culture 1, no. 1 (2025).

Tambunan, Warda Mardiana, Tiara Hidayah B, and Miftahur Rahmah. “In Contemporary Qur ’ Anic Exegesis Cannot Always Be Addressed Satisfactorily through a Rigidly Formalist Reading of Legal Verses . Vision by Moving from Specific Historical Rulings to General Ethical Principles and Then Back.” Journal of Qur’anic Legal Studies and Exegesis 01, no. 1 (2026): 21–39.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Husna, M., & Fatimah Zahra. (2026). kināyah In Qur’an 2:187: A Study of Qur’anic Aesthetics, Linguistic Ethics, And Legal Implications. An-Najah: Jurnal Ushuluddin Dan Studi Islam, 1(1), 107–123. Retrieved from https://bahsisfikr.or.id/index.php/ANJUSI/article/view/29

Issue

Section

Articles