Tashbih in the Qur’an: An Analysis of Its Rhetorical Structure and Semantic Functions
Keywords:
tashbīh, qur’anic rhetoric, semantic functions, arabic balāghah, qur’anic studiesAbstract
This article examines tashbīh in the Qur’an as a semantic-rhetorical structure through which comparison organizes meaning, shapes perception, and strengthens theological and moral communication. The study addresses the tendency to treat tashbīh either as an ornamental category of Arabic balāghah or as a simple explanatory device, without sufficient attention to its internal rhetorical architecture and wider semantic functions. Using a qualitative textual-hermeneutical method, the article analyses selected Qur’anic passages containing explicit and implicit forms of tashbīh, with attention to the relationship between mushabbah, mushabbah bih, wajh al-shabah, and adāt al-tashbīh. The analysis combines classical Arabic rhetoric, Qur’anic stylistics, and modern semantic theory. The findings show that Qur’anic tashbīh operates first as a structured rhetorical architecture that connects abstract realities with concrete images. Second, it functions as semantic concretization, making theological and eschatological meanings perceptible through images such as vegetation, dust, light, darkness, fire, water, storms, and fragile dwellings. Third, tashbīh works as argumentative rhetoric by transforming comparison into persuasion, warning, and moral evaluation. Finally, the study demonstrates that Qur’anic tashbīh should be understood beyond ornamentation as a semantic-rhetorical method that links eloquence, cognition, and revelation. The article contributes to Qur’anic Studies, Arabic rhetoric, Ushuluddin, and Islamic literary hermeneutics by offering an integrated model for reading Qur’anic comparison as a dynamic mode of meaning-making.
References
Abdul-Raof, H. Text Linguistics of Qur’anic Discourse: An Analysis. Text Linguistics of Qur’anic Discourse: An Analysis, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315670942.
Abdul-Raof, Hussein. Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis. Routledge, 2006. https://www.routledge.com/search?kw=Arabic Rhetoric A Pragmatic Analysis Abdul-Raof.
———. New Horizons in Qur’anic Linguistics: A Syntactic, Semantic and Stylistic Analysis. Routledge, 2017. https://www.routledge.com/search?kw=New Horizons in Qur%27anic Linguistics Abdul-Raof.
———. Qur’an Translation: Discourse, Texture and Exegesis. RoutledgeCurzon, 2001.
Al-Jurjānī, ʿAbd al-Qāhir. Dalāʾil Al-Iʿjāz Fī Al-Qurʾān. Edited by Maḥmūd Muḥammad Shākir. Maktabat al-Khānjī, 2004. https://search.worldcat.org/search?q=Dalail+al-Ijaz+al-Jurjani+Mahmud+Muhammad+Shakir.
Al-Qazwīnī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Al-Īḍāḥ Fī ʿulūm Al-Balāgha: Al-Maʿānī, Al-Bayān, Wa-Al-Badīʿ. Edited by Ibrāhīm Shams al-Dīn. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2023. https://www.al-ilmiyah.com/search?search=الإيضاح في علوم البلاغة.
Alhassen, Leyla Ozgur. How the Qur’an Works: Reading Sacred Narrative. Oxford University Press, 2023. https://global.oup.com/academic/search?q=How the Qur%27an Works Reading Sacred Narrative Alhassen.
Alshomary, Milad, Roxanne El Baff, Timon Gurcke, and Henning Wachsmuth. “The Moral Debater: A Study on the Computational Generation of Morally Framed Arguments.” ArXiv, 2022. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.14563.
Ardiansyah, Al Fiqri, and Marhamah Annazah Tambunan. “From Normative Citation to Critical Analysis: Evaluating Methodological Problems in Contemporary Indonesian Qur’anic Scholarship.” Dialogues in Qur’anic and Hadith Studies 1, no. 1 (2026): 1–26. https://journal.bahsisfikr.or.id/index.php/DQHS/article/view/12.
Ardiansyah, Al Fiqri, Marhamah Annazah Tambunan, Randy Putra Alamsyah, Idrus Afandi Akbar, and Nuruddin Nuruddin. “Qiwāmah and Epistemic Violence: A Critical Socio-Legal Analysis of Gendered Authority in Islamic Family Law.” Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 3, no. 2 (2025): 605–626. https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v3i2.100.
Ardiansyah, Al Fiqri. “Kritik terhadap Hermeneutika dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an: Perspektif Ulama Tradisional dan Kontemporer.” Al-Muhith: Jurnal Ilmu Qur’an dan Hadits 4, no. 1 (2025): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v4i1.4232.
Archer, George, Henry Bainbridge, and Mohammad Ali Amir-Moezzi, eds. The Routledge Companion to the Qur’an. Routledge, 2021. https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Companion-to-the-Quran/Archer-Bainbridge-Amir-Moezzi/p/book/9781138350867.
Azaiez, Mehdi, Gabriel Said Reynolds, Tommaso Tesei, and Hamza M Zafer, eds. “The Qur’an Seminar Commentary: A Collaborative Study of 50 Qur’anic Passages.” De Gruyter, 2016.
Badawi, Elsaid M, and M A S Abdel Haleem. Arabic-English Dictionary of Qur’anic Usage. Brill, 2008. https://brill.com/display/title/12559.
Chakrabarty, Tuhin, Smaranda Muresan, and Nanyun Peng. “Generating Similes Effortlessly Like a Pro: A Style Transfer Approach for Simile Generation.” ArXiv, 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.08942.
Creswell, John W, and Cheryl N Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Sage Publications, 2018.
Cuypers, M. The Composition of the Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis. The Composition of the Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis, 2015. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049160610&partnerID=40&md5=aa8750643913d2761fa34e5097f48c07.
Dancygier, Barbara, ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, 2017. https://www.cambridge.org/core/search?q=The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics Dancygier.
Durmus, Esin. “Towards Understanding Persuasion in Computational Argumentation.” ArXiv, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.01078.
Eemeren, Frans H van, and A Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation. Routledge, 2017. https://www.routledge.com/search?kw=Argumentation Analysis and Evaluation van Eemeren Snoeck Henkemans.
Günther, Sebastian, and Todd Lawson, eds. Roads to Paradise: Eschatology and Concepts of the Hereafter in Islam. Vol. 1–2. Brill, 2017. https://brill.com/display/title/31623.
Hadoux, Emmanuel, Anthony Hunter, and Sylwia Polberg. “Strategic Argumentation Dialogues for Persuasion: Framework and Experiments Based on Modelling the Beliefs and Concerns of the Persuadee.” ArXiv, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.11870.
He, Qianyu, Shiqi Cheng, Zhe Li, Ruobing Xie, and Yanghua Xiao. “Can Pre-Trained Language Models Interpret Similes as Smart as Human?” ArXiv, 2022. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.08452.
Hsieh, Hsiu-Fang, and Sarah E Shannon. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15, no. 9 (2005): 1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
Ishii, M, S Albrecht, S Raidoo, and P Stowers. “Abortion Education: Teaching the next Generation of Clinicians.” Discover Education 2, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00080-9.
Kövecses, Zoltán. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2020. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/extended-conceptual-metaphor-theory/.
Krippendorff, Klaus. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2019.
Lange, Christian. Paradise and Hell in Islamic Traditions. Cambridge University Press, 2016. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/paradise-and-hell-in-islamic-traditions/8BB7A1813C0D2A172FF7DB22059C59E1.
Littlemore, Jeannette. Metaphors in the Mind: Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor. Cambridge University Press, 2019. https://www.cambridge.org/core/search?q=Metaphors in the Mind Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor.
Mawaddah, Niswa, Hilya Mahfuza, Syifa Farizkha Indriani, and Dinda Silvani Paranginangin. “Hadith as an Epistemic Tradition: Toward a Dialogue Between Classical Criticism and Modern Academic Inquiry.” Dialogues in Qur’anic and Hadith Studies 1, no. 1 (2026): 50–76. https://journal.bahsisfikr.or.id/index.php/DQHS/article/view/16.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. The Study Qur’an. New York: HarperOne, 2015.
Neuwirth, Angelika. The Qur’an and Late Antiquity: A Shared Heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Reynolds, Gabriel Said. The Qur’an and the Bible: Text and Commentary. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.
Rippin, A, and J Mojaddedi. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Qur’ān, Second Edition. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Qur’ān, Second Edition, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118964873.
Schreier, Margrit. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage, 2012.
Semino, Elena. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press, 2008. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/metaphor-in-discourse/.
Shah, M, and M A Haleem. The Oxford Handbook of Qur’anic Studies. The Oxford Handbook of Qur’anic Studies, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199698646.001.0001.
Sinai, Nicolai. Key Terms of the Qur’an: A Critical Dictionary. Princeton University Press, 2023. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691241319/key-terms-of-the-quran.
Sirry, Mun’im. The Quran with Cross-References. De Gruyter, 2022. https://www.degruyter.com/document/isbn/9783110780004/html.
Steen, Gerard J. “Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic Assumptions, Main Tenets, Urgent Issues.” Intercultural Pragmatics 14, no. 1 (2017): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0001.
Tindale, Christopher W. The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception. Cambridge University Press, 2015. https://www.cambridge.org/core/search?q=The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception Tindale.
Zayed, Omnia, John P McCrae, and Paul Buitelaar. “Contextual Modulation for Relation-Level Metaphor Identification.” ArXiv, 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.05633.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 An-Najah: Jurnal Ushuluddin dan Studi Islam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




